Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07082 12
Original file (07082 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

7018. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket : 07082-12
20 November 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO 2 eR

Ref: la} Tatis 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 6812/0600
of 16 Nov 2012

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner
received Passed but Not navanced (PNA) points from advancement
‘cycles 086, 087, and 088, in addition, that he was advanced to
E-6/LS1 from the August 2011, cycle 089, Navy-wide Reserve
advancement examination.

o. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and
Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 19 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval

records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

Ix, 22 correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to che effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION

onsider

Upon review and c
ht of the content

especially in 119
finds the exis
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's na
as follows:

Petitioner was advanced
advancement ex
th a Time In Rate d

Bis
Navy-wide Reserve
of 16 May 2012 wi

b. That a cop
Petitioner's naval record.
(c)

4. Pursuant to Section 6

Board for Correction

Section 723.6(c) )

present at t
foregoing is
proceedings in ©

 

6 (e)
Naval Records |

and having assu
announced that the foregoin

authority of reference
behalf of the Secre

20 November 2012

ation of all the evi
gs of enclosure

warranting t

val record be corrected,

tp B-6/L81 Ff

amination wit
ate of 1 January 2012.

y of this Report ©

of Naval Records

ce with its provisions,

 

Docket No. 07082-12

dence of record, and
(2), the Board

he following

where appropriate.

rom the August 2047
h an effective date

£ Proceedings be filed in

4t is hereby
tion, taken under the
ved by the Board on

tary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07397 12

    Original file (07397 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 07397-12 20) November 2012 ¢ Correction of Naval Records Chairman, Board fo From: To: secretary of the Navy sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1 _ EY Ref: (a) Title 16 U.S. 1552 Encl 1) DD Form 149 w/attachments Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser B12/0548 (a) Petitioner filed in effect, that the ow that Petitioner's ination, of reference requesting, ted to sh rve advancement...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10262 11

    Original file (10262 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2012 and, pursuant to 4ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be teken on the available evidence of record. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. VOZ62-12 that Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12258-08

    Original file (12258-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They reason that although the command erred in allowing Petitioner to take the September 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam for I1T3, Petitioner was not eligible to take the exam per BUPERINST 1430.16F which states that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06679 12

    Original file (06679 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the August 2010 E-5/IS2 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, George and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00379 12

    Original file (00379 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/HT3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/HT3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11272 11

    Original file (11272 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    g. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had never been held back in any way from progressing through his Navy career due to security clearance issues and he was not aware that there was a deficiency that would disqualify him from competing for advancement. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8459-13

    Original file (NR8459-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10656 11

    Original file (10656 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under BUPERINST 1430.16F, (Advancement Manual for Enlisted Personnel of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Navy Reserve), all personnel designated in certain ratings, including Petitioner’s rating, “must maintain, as a minimum, continuous security clearance eligibility.” This provision has been interpreted by NPC to mean that, in order to be eligible to participate in an advancement cycle, take an advancement exam or advance to the next highest grade, a Sailor in one of the designated ratings must hold...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11652 11

    Original file (11652 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/MC3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11653 11

    Original file (11653 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/MC3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...